| |
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
Cognitive impairment as a strong predictor of incident disability in specific ADL-IADL tasks among community-dwelling elders the Azuchi Study | | Author(s) | Hiroko H Dodge, Takashi Kadowaki, Takehito Hayakawa |
| Journal title | The Gerontologist, vol 45, no 2, April 2005 |
| Pages | pp 222-230 |
| Source | http://www.geron.org |
| Keywords | Cognitive impairment ; Self care capacity ; Mobility ; Dementia ; Evaluation ; Living in the community ; Longitudinal surveys ; Cross sectional surveys ; Japan. |
| Annotation | In a 3-year follow-up of older people living in the community in Azuchi, Japan, cognition was assessed using the Hasegawa Dementia Scale, to examine the cross-sectional association between cognitive impairment and functional disability in each activity of daily living and instrumental activity of daily living (ADL / IADL) item. Cognitive impairment was also examined as a risk factor for incident disability in each ADL-IADL item. Cross-sectionally, severity of cognitive impairment was associated with disability in each ADL-IADL task, with larger effects shown for ADL items. Longitudinally, minimally or mildly cognitively impaired individuals had a significantly higher risk of losing functional abilities compared to those with intact cognition. The population attributable risk (PAR%) indicated that cognitive impairment accounts for 11% to 36% of incident disability in ADL-IADL tasks, with the highest PAR% shown for the ability to feed oneself. Cognitively impaired subjects are heterogeneous; the severity of cognitive impairment has a different impact on incident loss of task-specific ADL-IADL abilities, and comorbidities could affect disabilities differently. Consideration of these heterogeneities will enrich future studies on the impact of cognitive impairment on ADL-IADL abilities. (RH). |
| Accession Number | CPA-051117208 A |
| Classmark | E4: CA: C4: EA: 4C: K4: 3J: 3KB: 7DT |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
| ...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|