Centre for Policy on Ageing
 

 

Social necessity, individual rights, and the needs of the fragile
 — euthanasia in the context of end-of-life decision making
Author(s)Tom Koch, Kathryn L Braun, James H Pietsch
Journal titleJournal of Ethics, Law, and Aging, vol 5, no 1, Spring/Summer 1999
Pagespp 17-28
KeywordsEuthanasia ; Rights [elderly] ; Dying ; Terminal care ; Social ethics ; Social surveys ; United States of America.
AnnotationLegal and social debates over bioethical issues typically swing between two apparently irreconcilable principles. The first argues for individual self-determination, while the second argues for the need to diminish the social cost of maintaining the fragile. A third position, one put forward by disability campaigners, suggests that a failure to provide social support presents a context in which choices for a continuing quality of life are restricted. This article conceptualises the "moral space" created by these separate positions, and reports on the use of a multicultural, multigenerational survey of attitudes toward end-of-life issues to discuss its relative position. Results reported in this paper focus on responses to survey questions concerning euthanasia as a way of understanding the relationship between social support, individual decision making, and cultural variables as perceived by participating older people and their adult children in Honolulu, Hawaii. (RH).
Accession NumberCPA-990427209 A
ClassmarkCY: IKR: CX: LV: TQ: 3F: 7T

Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing

...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing.
 

CPA home >> Ageinfo Database >> Queries to: webmaster@cpa.org.uk